Learn / Tool intuition

Back to learn

Answer page / tool intuition

Topic cluster / Quant tool intuition

How should you think about Monte Carlo equity paths?

Monte Carlo is less about predicting one exact future and more about building path intuition: loss probability, drawdown depth, dispersion, and how ugly the journey can get even when the median outcome looks fine.

What to remember

  • Median terminal value
  • 10th and 90th percentile outcomes
  • Loss probability
  • Median and tail drawdowns

What Monte Carlo is good for

A Monte Carlo simulator is a path-distribution tool. It helps you stop staring only at CAGR and instead ask what kinds of drawdowns, unlucky stretches, and terminal ranges are compatible with your assumptions.

  • Median terminal value
  • 10th and 90th percentile outcomes
  • Loss probability
  • Median and tail drawdowns

What it is not

Monte Carlo is not a replacement for a real historical backtest. It does not know your market microstructure, your signal logic, or which regimes truly existed in the data. It is a simplification built to sharpen intuition, not prove an edge.

The mistake people make

The most common mistake is treating the median line as the forecast. The useful reading is the spread around it. If the 10th percentile path is unacceptable for your process or risk tolerance, the pretty median does not save you.

Why the Alphora tool is useful anyway

The GBM simulator gives you a fast way to reason about path dependence before you have a polished strategy. That makes it a great public learning surface, especially when paired with scenario pages that explain how a calm equity curve and a violent one can both be mathematically plausible.